The Omnipotent Intangibility of Brexit –an anarchist’s perspective



I currently live and work in the Middle East, where the last thing I expected people to care –much less worry—about is U.K. politics.  One would think nervous conversations would revolve around Isis, the latest terrorist attack, the stability of the regime… Yet this past month, the prospect and then the fact of Britain leaving E.U. has been the focus of apocalyptic anxieties. The words I read in mainstream media and hear around me would seem to express the effects of a war declaration rather than referendum results. Catastrophe, folly, fault, demise, hatred. Brexit supposedly leading to Trump’s presidential victory, the collapse of the E.U., rises in racism. As if these things could be caused by a single event.

The question is, what does Brexit actually cause in the lives of people? Why do Europeans living in the Middle East feel affected by it? Yes, there are ‘catastrophic’ economic consequences (the drop in the currency surely has been tangible to most Brits), but these are short-term: there will be trade agreements, as there have been between the E.U. and Norway and Switzerland. This is a simple matter—in terms of the economy, everything has changed only so everything can stay the same. As for the other tangible effects, that of borders and taxes, this only means experiencing what the majority of the world already does. As one Palestinian friend charmingly put it on facebook:

“oh so now a bit less racist white people will have a tiny taste of what it feels like to apply for visas and residency. What a sad day! Hand me the tissue box. #‎Brexit

The real issue is a question of identity politics: the intangible effects of Brexit. If Britian belonging to the E.U. was a symbol of ‘being European’, then leaving is a fundamental rejection of that identity. This is what anguishes most of my liberal-minded friends.

Yet placing the responsibility of one’s identity, be it a transnational one, in the hands of a national government, means ultimately accepting the nation-state. If you identify as European, be European. Why should a single national government have the power to give an entire population this right, or to take it away from them? Europeanness should not be about centralized bureaucracy, unelected autocrats, and an all-or-nothing ideology. Being a true (anarchist) European means not caring about Brexit.



  1. You nail it in the end: European identity is not the same as subservience to the Brussels bureaucracy.

    Accusing pro-brexiters of racism doesn’t make them so. I know many of them, and none is in any way racist. There are also racist anti-brexiters, and it’s unclear that one group is significantly more so than the other.

    Also, it is meaningless to try to identify the vague intentions of others, especially so outside of a larger analysis of their values and worldview, and especially in a collective way when they don’t even share common values and worldviews. Decisions should be made based on consequences, not vague intentions.

    Politics is all a farce and getting emotionally involved in it is a trap to keep people subservient.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s